I’ll take the film over the book thank you ….

After reading Elizabeth Guizzetti’s recent blog post about the new Hobbit film, it got me thinking about the connection between novels and their film counterparts. Almost all critics will say that the book is much superior to the film, usually because the book is so detailed and full of charm and atmosphere which ultimately doesn’t translate well to the silver screen. And I must say that this statement is mostly true for me, although there are a few exceptions.

atonementbook The first book that I was disappointed in (after seeing the film first) was Ian McEwan’s Atonement. I loved the twist at the end of the film and I loved the atmosphere and action during Robbie’s time in France. James McAvoy is a talented actor and brought a lot to the role; Keira Knightly even won me over with the stern portrayal of Cecilia. However, the book seemed to drag onwards, never really grabbing you and taking you along with the characters. It was far more centred on the misuse of the ‘C’ word than about the characters. I did persevere with the novel however, but ultimately by the end I found myself wishing that the book would end.

The second book was Memoirs of a Geisha by MemoirsGeishaArthur Golden, which tells the awful, tragic story of Chiyo Sakamoto and her life within a geisha house. The film gave the story an addictive character and an impression of what life must have been like for poor girls of Japan who were sold to become geisha’s. I found the film in particular, educated me more than what the book did. Of course, the book is there to entertain rather than educate, but as a Western reader, you do take some things on board. The book also seemed to focus on minor details rather than focusing on the bigger moments. I enjoyed Memoirs of a Geisha (the book) more than I enjoyed Atonement (the book) but overall I was left with a somewhat distasteful opinion.

Of course, one could assume that literary books are just simply not for me, if you go on the above books. They both tend to focus more on character and language rather than action and in all honesty I probably do love more commercial books than literary ones, but that’s simply not because I fail to understand the books. It may be cynical of me to assume, but it’s almost derogatory to admit that you don’t like a literary book, as if you aren’t a ‘proper’ reader.

However, despite reading more books with a mass market appeal, I did enjoy The Color Purple by Alice Walker and The World According to Garp by John Irving. Both considered to be literary. I’m even reading (and enjoying) The Casual Vacancy by JK Rowling at the moment, which could be sorted into Modern Literary. So I don’t really have a problem with literary novels, just those that lack something special.

But what about you? Have you enjoyed a film more significantly than the book? Get in touch and perhaps we can see if there is a trend.

6 thoughts on “I’ll take the film over the book thank you ….

  1. Okay no one would consider my tastes literary. I read a lot of science fiction and fantasy.
    I loved Jurassic Park the film, much better than the book. When I read Jurassic Park, I thought it was a good book and I enjoyed it, but there were parts of the movie that made me jump out of my seat the first time I watched it.

    I liked the 80’s version of Dune better than the book. I am about to shock you, I liked Peter Jackson’s LotR’s better than the books: at least Return of the King which I was battling to read, but I’ve watched the trilogy numerous times.

    I don’t care about the changes as long as if a film can catch the flavor of the original book.

    1. That’s really interesting – I’ve never read any Michael Crichton myself but I’ve always been interested in his book ‘Congo’.

      My friend loves dinosaurs and in particularly the Jurassic Park Series. He read the books after the films, but still loves the films more. He likes the Sam Neil portrayal better than the character in the book.

  2. Great piece, I’d say I’ve been mostly let down conversions (The Golden Compass being perhaps the saddest :(), but I agree that the odd one shines through – Hunger Games, Shawshank redemption and Watership Down to name a few of the top of my head 🙂

    1. Great list, Jack. And I definitely agree with The Golden Compass – how sad! It had great potential!

  3. I enjoyed the movie Shawshank Redemption more than the book, but it did have an amazing cast! 😉

    1. Hi Dianne, I only watched Shawshank for the first time this year. You’re right – it was a great film 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close